Sounds like a PC game, the things with the levels. But I like it!

I don't think there is any reason to expect our mind could exist outside our bodies.
If a brain injury can change your personality or make you lose your memory how could it remain after death?

And how could you explain the fact that right now you think about whatever you want, what's the thing that makes you think what you do, that lets you, YOURSELF and no one else feel, move as you wish? Is that only brain? How is that possible?

How would you define the freedom of mind and thoughts? I'd say it is only based on our genetical content (and their epigenetic activeness) and the effects of our surroundings based on the twin studies.

Our brains are unique and they change all the time. Reading this text will provably change the way your brains works by either building new connection between your neurons or re-activating the old ones. New brain reasearch indicates many things. With PET fMRI and the old MRI we can even point at your brains and say that this area here proves you are in love (for example).

Our movement is caused by electricity that travels in our neural pathways and causes different Neurotransmitters to move the message on.
You can test this out yourself by interrupting your hand cordination areas in you brain with magnetic pulses. After that your hand won't stop shaking and you can't have precise control over it. (well in reality this can't be done without the help of experts)

I voted yes, partly because I hope the party doesn't stop once you die, partly because I have the feeling there must be more (can't really explain it.)

I voted yes. I believe in life after death and also ghosts.

I haven't read it quite thoroughly. But there's only one thing I have to say on this: science and knowledge have gone way too far.... and they're starting slowly to turn their back on us, mark my words.

All the questions that science has given us the answer to, have only raised more questions. A bit like the hydra in Greek mythology, chop of one head and two more will grow. Scientists are sad people actually, they'll never find fulfillment in what they do.

So you prefer guessing and false beliefs over the truth?
I think life is good enough to be enjoyed as it is.



So you want more Philosophy do you. The traditional thought about truth is that it is the end of scientific research as in research ends when the truth is found. Yet one theory is that the truth changes. What is true now depends on where the research has gone. For example in the 1700s smoking is healthy was the truth. Now it isn't.

Another classical way of seeing the truth is thinking that what fits the world has to be true as in statement: it rains *looks outside and sees drops of water falling down: yes it is true.

If you disgree with science then either you are wrong or the science is wrong. Science is created by prooves and arguments under the reigning Paradigm. Your beliefs however usually are born under less reliable circumistances and are always subjective.
Science is always neutral and if you don't think it is neutral the you are free to express additions to the scientific method to improve it.

I never said that scientific answers are false. The thing is that there always will be questions. The answering of one questions opens the gate for many more questions (examples are found in astronomy, no, not the Dragonland album (which is awesome by the way)).